> On Jan 23, 2025, at 5:37 PM, Robert Feldman via cctalk > <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > ... > > The answer to your question is one that even mainstream physicists (Lord > Kelvin) have gotten wrong in the past. See > https://www.americanscientist.org/article/kelvin-perry-and-the-age-of-the-earth > Absolutely. Lots of earlier physics is either very wrong or actually only an approximation. (Newtonian gravitation is an example of the latter.) This is why "settled science" is a crackpot notion. Galileo knew better and explained it very well. paul
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? donald donaldwhittemore.com via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Robert Feldman via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Reall... Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? R... Jonathan Stone via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Reall... Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? R... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: ... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: ... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- [cctalk] ... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] ... dwight via cctalk
- [ccta... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? R... Sellam Abraham via cctalk