> On Jan 21, 2025, at 6:03 AM, ben via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > On 2025-01-20 2:51 p.m., Alexander Schreiber via cctalk wrote: > ee a breakthrough it that either. >> There have been various "simulate early (theoretical) earth conditions >> in the lab to see what happens" and while at least some got all the way >> to some interesting organic molecules, none of them reached even the most >> primitive life forms - maybe they just need to refine their experiments >> and run them for a billion years? ;-) > It still could be solved as puzzle. > You need enzymes to make enzymes or you just end up with primeval soup. > It just has to work say 10% in the positive direction of the time for > something useful start with. Use that as weird molecule zip and unzip RNA > segments. > One factor, gravity may have been .5 G back then Uh, what? How would the earth surface gravity be that much different? "Citation needed" as Wikipedia would say. paul
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Adrian Godwin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? dwight via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Alexander Schreiber via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Alexander Schreiber via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? roger arrick via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Will Cooke via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? David Wade via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Steve Lewis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Alexander Schreiber via cctalk