> On Jan 17, 2025, at 11:03 AM, Jon Elson via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > On 1/17/25 09:46, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: >> >> I don't remember if it's part of the standard, but separate compilation is a >> common extension in a bunch of languages. I don't remember if the Pascal I >> learned on (PDP-10) has it, but I would certainly expect the VMS version to >> do so. > I can state certainly that VMS Pascal had separate compilation features, that > were VERY similar to Borland's method. > Jon One important aspect of VMS design was a common calling standard, capable of supporting all the languages VMS has, in any combination. So you could write C programs that call COBOL support routines, or vice versa, all in a well documented way. paul
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... David Wise via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Adrian Godwin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Joseph S. Barrera III via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... roger arrick via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Win... Joseph S. Barrera III via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Windows Martin Bishop via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Windows Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Try Algol 68 on Windows ben via cctalk