> On Aug 15, 2024, at 7:09 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2024, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: >>>> I don't know about the VAX,but my gripe is the x86 and the 68000 don't >>>> automaticaly promote smaller data types to larger ones. What little >>>> programming I have done was in C never cared about that detail. >>>> Now I can see way it is hard to generate good code in C when all the >>>> CPU's are brain dead in that aspect. > > It is not the hardware that is at fault. > If anybody else is to blame, it is the compiler. More likely the language designers, assuming the compiler doesn't have a standards violation in its code. In the case of C, the type promotion rules that were just explained are rather bizarre and surprising. Other languages do it differently, with perhaps fewer surprises. Some define it very carefully (ALGOL 68 comes to mind), some not so much. paul
- [cctalk] A little off-topic but at least somewhat... Peter Ekstrom via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A little off-topic but at least... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A little off-topic but at l... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A little off-topic but at l... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A little off-topic but ... Sean Conner via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A little off-topic ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A little off-t... Mike Katz via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A little off-t... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A little o... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A litt... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A litt... Mike Katz via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A litt... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A litt... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A litt... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A litt... Mike Katz via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A litt... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A litt... Mike Katz via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A litt... Mike Katz via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: A litt... Fred Cisin via cctalk