> On Mar 11, 2023, at 5:34 PM, Chuck Guzis <ccl...@sydex.com> wrote: > > On 3/11/23 13:28, Paul Koning wrote: > >> >> Dijkstra said as much when he evaluated the 1620 for possible use by the TU >> Eindhoven -- a big problem is that it was unable to handle arbitrary 8-bit >> data. > > Oh heck, there's no way to test for a numeric blank. Compare works only > for numeric data. The system can't tell the difference between a card > punched with 8-4 or 8-4-1, for example. Lots of holes in the > architecture. But that doesn't mean you couldn't do useful work with it. I agree entirely. What Dijkstra was doing was evaluating a number of machines to see if they would serve as the university's primary computer. And given the 1620's limitations he had good reason to conclude that it's not well suited for that job. Suited for more limited jobs? Definitely. paul
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mi... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Gavin Scott via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... jim stephens via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Sellam Abraham via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Sytse van Slooten via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Rich Alderson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Rich Alderson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Jay Jaeger via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Chuck Guzis via cctalk