> On Mar 11, 2023, at 3:38 PM, Chuck Guzis <ccl...@sydex.com> wrote: > > On 3/11/23 10:48, Paul Koning wrote: > >> Speaking of 1620 peripherals, I know there were paper tape reader/punch >> options for it. Has anyone ever encountered those in the wild? > > I've seen a 1621 paper tape unit, but never used it. That always seemed > to be the wrong answer to the problem of input, particularly for > programming work. Dijkstra said as much when he evaluated the 1620 for possible use by the TU Eindhoven -- a big problem is that it was unable to handle arbitrary 8-bit data. paul
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mi... Kevin Monceaux via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mi... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Gavin Scott via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... jim stephens via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Sellam Abraham via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Sytse van Slooten via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Rich Alderson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Rich Alderson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Paul Koning via cctalk