Aside from the very general Algol report and the Iverson book on APL, I have to admit that most of my programming knowledge came out of manufacturer's manuals, specific to a maker's systems.
The APL book was, at the time, pretty much useless for writing any sort of serious code until you got hold of the manual for a particular system that you were going to use. Even the early McCracken books on FORTRAN had a section in the rear that attempted to gloss over different manufacturer's features and "extensions" (e.g. What does "B" punched in column 1 of a FORTRAN statement card mean--and for what system?) Lest anyone forget, that in the pre-1960 world, a lot more of production code was written in the assembly code/autocoder of a particular system. Even the DEC "Introduction to Programming" dealt specifically with the PDP-8 and was useless for the PDP-10. ACM CALGO back then accepted algorithm submissions in FORTRAN or Algol, but that's hardly an instructional text. I guess the question boils down to 'In the world before 1960, how *useful* was a general book on programming?" --Chuck
