> On Jul 29, 2020, at 8:20 PM, Warner Losh via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > How much of the IP does DEC need to own (the license is unclear on this > point)? Unless they conveyed the Copyrights to Supnik in writing (which is > possible), I would assume that's the case, given the notices that appear in the current text (and the somewhat different ones in early editions). I know Bob to be careful about such things. > they (well their successors in interest) still have an ownership > interest in the emulator. One could make a case that the wording of the > license is imprecise enough (it didn't exclude successors in interest, for > example). Though finding out would require litigation, which is an > expensive game... and is apparently against the wishes of Mentec, at least > as expressed privately over the years... At this point the interested party would be XX2247 LLC, I suppose. paul
- Re: OpenVMS Community... geneb via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Kevin Lee via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Andrew Back via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Bob Smith via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Rico Pajarola via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community... Andrew Back via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License John Foust via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License geneb via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Chris Hanson via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Zane Healy via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Chris Hanson via cctalk