> JBIG2 .. introduces so many actual factual errors (typically > substituted letters and numbers)
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
It's probably worth noting that there are often errors _in the original documents_, too - so even a perfect image doesn't guarantee no errors.
. . . and how often will the randomizing corruption actually result in changing an error to what it SHOULD HAVE BEEN? :-)
Although looking again at the PDF, the two digits in question are quite clear and crisp, and don't seem like they could be scanning errors.
Watch out. PDF with OCR can show you a clear and crisp [possibly wrong] interpretation of the scan, not what the actual scan looked like.