ons 2019-08-21 klockan 18:30 +0100 skrev Antonio Carlini via cctalk: > On 21/08/2019 15:46, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote: > > I have mixed reactions to it. I use it some, often to see if > > something is > > online at all. (If I buy a manual, I usually check, to see if I > > need to > > scan it, and get it to Al. Have a backlog at the moment, sigh.) > > > > The problem is that there are 'false negatives'; i.e. entries where > > they say 'none known online', but which are available. > > It is (AFAIK) a one-person effort (although it's now on its second > person after the originator dropped out). > > > There's always been a link to create a "bug report" for missing > manuals > (or incorrect ones I guess). However that points at codeplex, which > MS > have made read-only, so I don't know what the correct mechanism might > be > to get things fixed. I guess the owner needs to move the code > somewhere > else ... > >
would something like mender.io be something like that ?
