mua?
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Grant Taylor via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > On 02/21/2018 05:26 AM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk wrote: > >> I have to say that I hate this email thread abuse so much...! >> > > ;-) > > Is it so difficult to leave the thread about PICTURES (fill in whatever >> topic it was about) intact? >> > > I suspect it's either people that don't know they are breaking threading > or MUAs that behave badly. > > I'm on a list where it seems as if a frequent contributer uses an MUA that > does not send In-Reply-To or References headers at all. It doesn't even > send a User-Agent header. *sigh* > > And on the other hand there are those people who seem to be unable to >> create a prober reply to the list and therefore make threads appear >> scattered and broken into many many pieces... >> > > I've taken to leveraging Mutt's ability to "link-threads" (&) and > "break-thread" (#) to ""fix things and make the thread appear like I want > in Thunderbird. > > And yes, I know that I sent this message as a reply to another message. >> > > I think your reply is in direct response to the message that it is > replying to. So … I think you're on the lighter side of gray here. :-) > > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die >