Dear Eleanor, dear Michel (?), 

A while ago we statistically analysed the distribution of R, Rfree and of their 
difference as a function of the logarithm of resolution (Urzhumtsev et al., 
2009, Acta Cryst, D65, 1283-1291). 
In this log-scale, the mode values for all three are nearly linear functions 
(see Figs. 4 and 5 and equations (11) and (12) ). 

At 3A resolution, indeed, 3% difference is too small but anyhow 10% seems to be 
not common; just from pure statistics, its mode is rather closer to 5%. At 1A, 
the mode of Rfree-R distribution is near 2%. 

With best wishes, 

Sacha Urzhumtsev 

----- Le 6 Mar 20, à 16:22, Eleanor Dodson 
<0000176a9d5ebad7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> a écrit : 

> You dont give the data resolution - that is very important..
> I hate this rule bound approach to Rfree - R differences.. but as a guide
> No non-crystallographic symmetry.
> 1A data - you would expect them to be almost equal
> 3A data - I would expect a difference of at least 10% - once had the pleasure 
> of
> sendng a paper back as unreasonable when the data was only to 3A and the r
> factors differed by 3%

> Pseudo-symmetry and non-crystallographic symmetry can make things more
> complicated.
> Ideally reflections related by such symmetry should match - either set belong 
> to
> the Rfree set, or working set.

> The best way to get a low Rfactor and a high Rfree is to have virtually no
> geometric restraints. ie have a very high weighting term.
> The auto selection works pretty well in my experience..

> Not really an answer but some ideas..
> Eleanor

> On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 13:32, M T < [ mailto:michel...@gmail.com |
> michel...@gmail.com ] > wrote:

>> Dear BBers,

>> I am trying to refine a structure using COOT and Refmac5 and I have some
>> concerns about overrefinement and x-ray term weight in Refmac5, based on the
>> fact that during refinement to let R factor to drift too far from Rfree is 
>> not
>> good...

>> So... First question about that : what is too far ? I have some values in 
>> mind
>> like 6% of difference is OK, 10% is not... But is there a relation in between
>> resolution of the structure and this difference? Should it be higher at lower
>> resolution, or always around 6-7% independently of the resolution?

>> Second question is, ok, I have a too big difference, lets say 9-10%... What
>> could be the reason of that and on what to play to reduce this difference?

>> One way I choose is to look at the x-ray term weight (even if I am totally 
>> sure
>> that Refmac5 is doing things better than me), because I saw that the final 
>> rms
>> on BondLength were to constraint (I have in mind that this value should stays
>> in between 0.02 and 0.01).
>> So I looked into Refmac log to know where was the starting point and I found
>> 8.75.
>> Then I tried several tests and here are the results:
>>      
>> *************************************************************************

>> R factor



>> Rfree        BondLength

>>      BondAngle



>> ChirVolume



>> Auto weighting and experimental sigmas boxes checked

>> 0.1932       0.2886

>>      0.0072

>>      1.6426



>> 0.1184



>> Weighting term at 4 and experimental sigmas box checked

>> 0.1780       0.3159

>>      0.1047

>>      8.1929



>> 0.5937



>> Weighting term at 4

>> 0.1792       0.3143

>>      0.1008

>>      7.8200



>> 0.5667



>> Weighting term at 15 and experimental sigmas box checked

>> 0.1783       0.3272

>>      0.2020

>>      1.6569



>> 0.9745



>> Weighting term at 15

>> 0.1801       0.3279

>>      0.2022

>>      12.5748



>> 0.9792



>> Weighting term at 8.75

>> 0.1790       0.3235

>>      0.1545

>>      10.5118



>> 0.7909



>> Auto weighting box checked

>> 0.1948       0.2880

>>      0.0076

>>      1.6308



>> 0.1176

>> Refinement Parameters

>> So like nothing looks satisfying I decided to ask my questions here...

>> What do you recommend to fix my problem, which is a too large difference 
>> between
>> R and Rfree?

>> Thank you for answers.

>> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>> [ https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 |
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 ]
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> [ https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 |
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 ]

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to