Thanks for the help, the old version of truncate did the trick.  Interestingly 
running the old version of truncate in either of the data reduction pipelines 
(with aimless or scala) produced mtz files containing no F's but the stand 
alone version produced an mtz with all the f's prsent.



cheers,



Steve



Dr Stephen Carr
Research Complex at Harwell (RCaH)
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Harwell Oxford
Didcot
Oxon OX11 0FA
United Kingdom
Email stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk
tel 01235 567717
________________________________
From: Parthasarathy Sampathkumar [spart...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June 2014 19:55
To: ccp4bb
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] ctruncate error

Yes.., I too had similar problem with Ctruncate, and used older truncate to 
overcome the issue.

Best Wishes,
Partha


On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:38 PM, jie liu 
<jl1...@njms.rutgers.edu<mailto:jl1...@njms.rutgers.edu>> wrote:
Hi

I also encountered the same problem after recent updates (not the most recent 
one, but a couple of updates back). Choosing to run old-truncate will get it 
around.

Best wishes

Jie

----- Original Message ----- From: "<Stephen Carr>" 
<stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk<mailto:stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk>>
To: <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 1:11 PM
Subject: [ccp4bb] ctruncate error



Dear CCP4bb,

I am experiencing an unusual error when running truncate.  The program appears 
to be converting I's to F's, but then failing to output them in the resulting 
mtz file, see mtzdump output below:

Col Sort    Min    Max    Num      %     Mean     Mean   Resolution   Type 
Column
num order               Missing complete          abs.   Low    High label

  1 ASC      0      26      0  100.00     12.6     12.6  79.95   3.00   H H
  2 NONE     0      15      0  100.00      4.3      4.3  79.95   3.00   H K
  3 NONE   -42      42      0  100.00      0.7     16.0  79.95   3.00   H L
  4 NONE    0.0    19.0     0  100.00     9.56     9.56  79.95   3.00   I 
FreeR_flag
  5 BOTH     ?       ?  12968    0.00      ?        ?  -999.00   0.00   F 
F_delta16
  6 BOTH     ?       ?  12968    0.00      ?        ?  -999.00   0.00   Q 
SIGF_delta16
  7 BOTH    0.0     0.0    25   99.81     0.00     0.00  42.22   3.00   D 
DANO_delta16
  8 BOTH    0.0     0.0 11253   13.22     0.00     0.00  42.22   3.00   Q 
SIGDANO_delta16
  9 BOTH     ?       ?  12968    0.00      ?        ?  -999.00   0.00   G 
F_delta16(+)
 10 BOTH     ?       ?  12968    0.00      ?        ?  -999.00   0.00   L 
SIGF_delta16(+)
 11 BOTH     ?       ?  12968    0.00      ?        ?  -999.00   0.00   G 
F_delta16(-)
 12 BOTH     ?       ?  12968    0.00      ?        ?  -999.00   0.00   L 
SIGF_delta16(-)
 13 BOTH     0       0     25   99.81      0.0      0.0  42.22   3.00   Y 
ISYM_delta16
 14 NONE   -8.9 72479.2    25   99.81   198.34   198.44  42.22   3.00   J 
IMEAN_delta16
 15 NONE    0.6  3135.7    25   99.81     5.25     5.25  42.22   3.00   Q 
SIGIMEAN_delta16
 16 NONE  -10.8 72479.2    25   99.81   198.18   198.37  42.22   3.00   K 
I_delta16(+)
 17 NONE    0.0  3135.7    25   99.81     6.79     6.79  42.22   3.00   M 
SIGI_delta16(+)
 18 NONE   -9.5 72479.2    25   99.81   198.30   198.47  42.22   3.00   K 
I_delta16(-)
 19 NONE    0.0  3135.7    25   99.81     6.70     6.70  42.22   3.00   M 
SIGI_delta16(-)


No. of reflections used in FILE STATISTICS    12968

The truncate log file shows no obvious errors apart from the cumulative 
intensity plot which indicates no reflections, all other diagnostic indicators 
for data quality seem to suggest everything is ok.  I get the error with both 
ctruncate and truncate and also automatically as part of the scaling/merging 
pipelines.  The data were processed with imosflm, scaled with aimless with 
neither flagging any errors with the data.  I am running CCP4 6.4.0 on a linux 
box (Centos 6) and have installed the latest updates. Any suggestions as to 
what the fault might be and how to get around it would be greatly appreciated.

best wishes,

Steve

Dr Stephen Carr
Research Complex at Harwell (RCaH)
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Harwell Oxford
Didcot
Oxon OX11 0FA
United Kingdom
Email stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk<mailto:stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk>
tel 01235 567717
This email and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you 
are not the intended addressee or an authorized recipient of the addressee, 
please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, 
retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to this email.

Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those of the Research Complex at Harwell.

There is no guarantee that this email or any attachments are free from viruses 
and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result 
of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.

We use an electronic filing system. Please send electronic versions of 
documents, unless paper is specifically requested.

This email may have a protective marking, for an explanation, please see:
http://www.mrc.ac.uk/About/informationandstandards/documentmarking/index.htm.


This email and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you 
are not the intended addressee or an authorized recipient of the addressee, 
please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, 
retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to this email.



Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those of the Research Complex at Harwell.



There is no guarantee that this email or any attachments are free from viruses 
and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result 
of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.



We use an electronic filing system. Please send electronic versions of 
documents, unless paper is specifically requested.



This email may have a protective marking, for an explanation, please see:

http://www.mrc.ac.uk/About/informationandstandards/documentmarking/index.htm.



Reply via email to