I was missing the semicolon, but it still fails

On 12 Aug 2011, at 10:12, Antony Oliver wrote:

> Interesting iPhone formatting things going on...  Let's try again...
> 
> First line is "greater than symbol" > followed by some text about your 
> protein then closed with a semicolon. The next line is blank. The next line 
> contains your amino acid sequence, which you can also close with an optional 
> asterisk. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 12 Aug 2011, at 10:06, "Antony Oliver" <antony.oli...@sussex.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> PIR is fairly similar to Fasta, from addled memory the format is...
>> 
>>> protein name;
>> ----empty line----
>> MPREIL...rest of amino acid sequence with an optional asterisk to mark the 
>> sequence end.
>> 
>> Tony
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 12 Aug 2011, at 09:14, "Phil Evans" <p...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> Can anyone get this server to work? For me it keeps complaining that my 
>>> sequence file is not a PIR file. The file looks OK to me, but I've never 
>>> really understood what a PIR file is
>>> 
>>> Phil
>>> 
>>> On 12 Aug 2011, at 01:39, Kevin Jin wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Should we really have some crystallographers to review and qc those 
>>>> structures before the formal releasing?  JCSG has set a very good 
>>>> mechanism for this issue.
>>>> 
>>>> There is a sever for self check.
>>>> 
>>>> http://smb.slac.stanford.edu/jcsg/QC/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Jacob Keller 
>>>> <j-kell...@fsm.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>>>> I think they fudged the data in this paper...
>>>> 
>>>> JPK
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:30 PM, David Schuller <dj...@cornell.edu> wrote:
>>>>> link: http://iai.asm.org/cgi/reprint/IAI.05661-11v1
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ferric C. Fang & Arturo Casadevall
>>>>> Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
>>>>> Infec. Immun. doi:10.1128/IAI.05661-11
>>>>> 
>>>>> Abstract: Articles may be retracted when their findings are no longer
>>>>> considered trustworthy due to scientific misconduct or error, they
>>>>> plagiarize previously published work, or are found to violate ethical
>>>>> guidelines. Using a novel measure that we call the “retraction index,” we
>>>>> found that the frequency of retraction varies among journals and shows a
>>>>> strong correlation with the journal impact factor.
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 
>>>>> (with special attention to Figure 1, Retraction Index vs. Impact Factor)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> =======================================================================
>>>>> All Things Serve the Beam
>>>>> =======================================================================
>>>>>                            David J. Schuller
>>>>>                            modern man in a post-modern world
>>>>>                            MacCHESS, Cornell University
>>>>>                            schul...@cornell.edu
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> *******************************************
>>>> Jacob Pearson Keller
>>>> Northwestern University
>>>> Medical Scientist Training Program
>>>> cel: 773.608.9185
>>>> email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
>>>> *******************************************
>>>> 

Reply via email to