Should we really have some crystallographers to review and qc those structures before the formal releasing? JCSG has set a very good mechanism for this issue.
There is a sever for self check. http://smb.slac.stanford.edu/jcsg/QC/ On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Jacob Keller < j-kell...@fsm.northwestern.edu> wrote: > I think they fudged the data in this paper... > > JPK > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:30 PM, David Schuller <dj...@cornell.edu> wrote: > > link: http://iai.asm.org/cgi/reprint/IAI.05661-11v1 > > > > Ferric C. Fang & Arturo Casadevall > > Retracted Science and the Retraction Index > > Infec. Immun. doi:10.1128/IAI.05661-11 > > > > Abstract: Articles may be retracted when their findings are no longer > > considered trustworthy due to scientific misconduct or error, they > > plagiarize previously published work, or are found to violate ethical > > guidelines. Using a novel measure that we call the “retraction index,” we > > found that the frequency of retraction varies among journals and shows a > > strong correlation with the journal impact factor. > > ... > > > > (with special attention to Figure 1, Retraction Index vs. Impact Factor) > > > > > > -- > > ======================================================================= > > All Things Serve the Beam > > ======================================================================= > > David J. Schuller > > modern man in a post-modern world > > MacCHESS, Cornell University > > schul...@cornell.edu > > > > > > -- > ******************************************* > Jacob Pearson Keller > Northwestern University > Medical Scientist Training Program > cel: 773.608.9185 > email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu > ******************************************* >
