Dear Konstatin, First I would reiterate what Fred has said: you only know the space group once the structure has been solved and completely refined. Especially bad maps and unsuccesful molecular replacements may point to a wrong space group assignment.
Second, what causes strong and weak reflections? I once worked it out for a case where only one axis was doubled, but I guess that in your case it might be similar: for the small unit cell, your crystal may look like AAAAAAAAA (all layers of A's, unit cell is A). In case of the doubled unit cell, the crystal will look like ABABABABAB (alternating layers of A and B's, unit cell AB). If A is identical to B, the scattering of the A's will cancel the scattering of the B's for the odd reflections and you have the small unit cell. If the A's are a little different from the B's, your even reflections will have the sum of the scattering of A and B, and the odd reflections will have the difference. So if the odd reflections are weak, this means that the differences between the A and B layers are small and you could consider to ignore them for a preliminary structure, keeping in mind that the resulting electron density will be the sum (superposition) of the densities of the A and B layers. You might get clashes, since the differences in A and B layers may be caused by the crystal packing so I would increase the allowed number of clashes e.g. in Phaser. Once you have the small unit cell, you could try to figure out how the big unit cell may look like. Your situation might be different, but I would definitively try it. Herman -----Original Message----- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Marco Lolicato Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 5:16 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] XDS question Thank you to all! @Frederic > > I have a problem with the following sentence: > "if I collect all spots I get good map, but it is impossible to solve the structure by molecular replacement" - if you have a good map (I assume electron density map) then the structure is solved... for me a good map is a map I can interpret. You're right, I said "good map" instead of "good output values". @Konstantin > > It is possible to process diffraction spots from both crystals using > XDS. The procedure is described here (under 'Index and integrate > multiple-crystal diffraction'): > http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/xdswiki/index.php/Tips_and_Tr > icks I tried but with no success! :( @Kay and all the others The following links are the images: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2127189780277&set=o.1363238963856 79&type=1&theater http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2127189180262&set=o.1363238963856 79&type=1&theater http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2127188820253&set=o.1363238963856 79&type=1&theater ...then a little bit more details... so, if I process only the strong spots I have those cell parameters: a=b=96.66 c=112.26 alpha=beta=gamma= 90 f I process all the spots I have those cell parameters: a=b=216.4 c=112.4 alpha=beta=gamma= 90 In both cases the space group is I422. Thank you again to all, do you have any other suggestion? Marco
