Marko is going to yell at me if I tell you anything other than IPX is the best.
Regards, Jay McMickle- CCIE #35355 From: Fulvio allegretti <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:32 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My Story CCIE#35355 Congrats Jay. Can you share where was the emphasis on your lab? Are the ipexpert volume 3 rapresentative or was the lab more focues on things like pfr, eem etc? Thanks Fulvio. > From: [email protected] > Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 76, Issue 40 > To: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:18:42 -0400 > > Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: PPPoE IPCP/DCHP and MPLS (Fulvio allegretti) > 2. Re: My Story CCIE#35355 (Jay McMickle) > 3. Re: RIP HOLD DOWN TIMER (Jay McMickle) > 4. Re: catalyst standard vs enhanced image capable switches > (Bob McCouch) > 5. Re: My Story CCIE#35355 (Debra Taylor) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 21:28:21 +0000 > From: Fulvio allegretti <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PPPoE IPCP/DCHP and MPLS > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Different masks, DHCP reflects the subnet. > > IPCP > R7#show ip int dialer 1 | i Internet > Internet address is 172.31.200.7/32 > DHCP > R7(config-if)#do show ip int dialer 1 | i Internet > Internet address is 172.31.200.7/25 > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 22:10:47 +0100 > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PPPoE IPCP/DCHP and MPLS > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > > show ip int dialer | i Internet > > > I wanted to compare the masks we got on the dialer from DHCP and IPCP > > > > On 11 May 2012 22:01, Fulvio allegretti <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Olu, here it is. I've labbed it again. There is something in it and I > pretty sure someone at ipexpert knows about this. I bumped into this as I was > doning Lab 1 vol 3, the requirement clearly states not to use IPCP on the > PPoE task, later on a different task we are asked to enable MPLS on that > link. I didn't follow the DHCP requirement, can't remember why, but I am > learning that the more you break things the more you learn. > > Starting with only PPoE configured. > > *****************R6 > > R6(config)#do sh ip int bri | ex un > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol > Virtual-Access1.1 172.31.200.6 YES TFTP up up > Virtual-Template1 172.31.200.6 YES manual down down > > R6(config)#do show run | s Dialer|Virtual|pool|dhcp > interface Virtual-Template1 > mtu 1492 > ip address 172.31.200.6 255.255.255.128 > peer default ip address pool TEST > ip local pool TEST 172.31.200.7 > R6(config)#do ping 172.31.200.7 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.31.200.7, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/4 ms > R6(config)# > > *************R7 > R7(config)#do sh ip int br | ex un > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol > Dialer1 172.31.200.7 YES IPCP up up > > R7(config)#do show run | s Dialer|Virtual|pool|dhcp > pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 > interface Dialer1 > mtu 1492 > ip address negotiated > encapsulation ppp > dialer pool 1 > > R7(config)#do ping 172.31.200.6 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.31.200.6, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/3/4 ms > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Assing loopback, adding static routes, enabling mpls > > *********************R6 > > R6(config)#do sh ip int bri | ex un > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol > Virtual-Access1.1 172.31.200.6 YES TFTP up up > Virtual-Template1 172.31.200.6 YES manual down down > Loopback0 192.168.6.6 YES manual up up > > R6(config)#do show run | s Dialer|Virtual|pool|dhcp > interface Virtual-Template1 > mtu 1492 > ip address 172.31.200.6 255.255.255.128 > mpls ip > peer default ip address pool TEST > ip local pool TEST 172.31.200.7 > > R6(config)#do sh mpls ldp n > Peer LDP Ident: 192.168.7.7:0; Local LDP Ident 192.168.6.6:0 > TCP connection: 192.168.7.7.62159 - 192.168.6.6.646 > State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 8/8; Downstream > Up time: 00:00:55 > LDP discovery sources: > Virtual-Access1.1, Src IP addr: 172.31.200.7 > Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident: > 172.31.200.7 192.168.7.7 > > R6(config)#do ping 172.31.200.7 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.31.200.7, timeout is 2 seconds: > ..... > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > > R6(config)#do ping 192.168.7.7 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.7.7, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms > R6(config)# > > R7(config)#do sh ip int bri | ex un > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol > Dialer1 172.31.200.7 YES IPCP up up > Loopback0 192.168.7.7 YES manual up up > > R7(config)#do show run | s Dialer|Virtual|pool|dhcp > pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 > interface Dialer1 > mtu 1492 > ip address negotiated > encapsulation ppp > dialer pool 1 > mpls ip > > R7(config)#do sh mpls ldp nei > Peer LDP Ident: 192.168.6.6:0; Local LDP Ident 192.168.7.7:0 > TCP connection: 192.168.6.6.646 - 192.168.7.7.62159 > State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 11/11; Downstream > Up time: 00:03:38 > LDP discovery sources: > Dialer1, Src IP addr: 172.31.200.6 > Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident: > 172.31.200.6 192.168.6.6 > R7(config)#do ping 172.31.200.6 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.31.200.6, timeout is 2 seconds: > ..... > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > R7(config)#do ping 192.168.6.6 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.6.6, timeout is 2 seconds: > ..... > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > R7(config)# > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let's change ip assignement to DHCP > R6(config-if)#do sh ip int bri | ex un > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol > Virtual-Access1.1 172.31.200.6 YES TFTP up up > Virtual-Template1 172.31.200.6 YES manual down down > Loopback0 192.168.6.6 YES manual up up > > R6(config-if)#do show run | s Dialer|Virtual|pool|dhcp > ip dhcp excluded-address 172.31.200.0 172.31.200.6 > ip dhcp excluded-address 172.31.200.8 172.31.200.255 > ip dhcp pool TESTDHCP > network 172.31.200.0 255.255.255.128 > interface Virtual-Template1 > mtu 1492 > ip address 172.31.200.6 255.255.255.128 > mpls ip > no peer default ip address > > R6(config-if)#do sh mpls ldp n > Peer LDP Ident: 192.168.7.7:0; Local LDP Ident 192.168.6.6:0 > TCP connection: 192.168.7.7.25521 - 192.168.6.6.646 > State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 8/8; Downstream > Up time: 00:01:04 > LDP discovery sources: > Virtual-Access1.1, Src IP addr: 172.31.200.7 > Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident: > 192.168.7.7 172.31.200.7 > R6(config-if)#do ping 172.31.200.7 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.31.200.7, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms > R6(config-if)# > > ********************R7 > R7(config-if)#do sh ip int bri | ex un > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol > Dialer1 172.31.200.7 YES DHCP up up > Loopback0 192.168.7.7 YES manual up up > R7(config-if)#do show run | s Dialer|Virtual|pool|dhcp > pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 > interface Dialer1 > mtu 1492 > ip address dhcp > encapsulation ppp > dialer pool 1 > mpls ip > R7(config-if)#do sh mpls ldp n > Peer LDP Ident: 192.168.6.6:0; Local LDP Ident 192.168.7.7:0 > TCP connection: 192.168.6.6.646 - 192.168.7.7.25521 > State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 9/9; Downstream > Up time: 00:01:55 > LDP discovery sources: > Dialer1, Src IP addr: 172.31.200.6 > Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident: > 192.168.6.6 172.31.200.6 > R7(config-if)#do ping 172.31.200.6 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.31.200.6, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms > R7(config-if)# > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:07:46 +0100 > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PPPoE IPCP/DCHP and MPLS > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > > > > Fulvio, > > > for the two configs (DHCP & IPCP) post output of > show run | s Dialer|Virtual|pool|dhcp > > > along with > > > show ip int dialer | i Internet > > > On 11 May 2012 09:38, Fulvio allegretti <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi there, > I have bumped into this and I am trying to understand the logic behind it. > The set up is two routers running PPPoE with the client ip address being > negotiated by IPCP. I then run MPLS over it, just adding mpls ip on the > interfaces, I've got my static routes to the loopbacks, neighbors come up, > I've got labels, it's all good execept that I can't ping the other end, I > can't sill ping the loopbacks. Change the ip assignment method to DHCP and it > is all working. Change it back to IPCP, no pin. Remove MPLS, ping is back. > Put MPLS back on, no ping. Change to DHCP ping is back. You get the > picture.........SIIL (stuck in ignorant loop that is). Fulvio > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > -- > Olugbenga Oyebande > MD, DAIT > 234-803-302-5287 > http://www.dait-ng.com > Cisco Networks, Network Security & Quality of Service > DAIT Linux Enterprise Network Servers, Web Portal Projects > Broadband Internet Deployment & ISP Consultancy > View Olugbenga Oyebande's profile > > > > -- > Olugbenga Oyebande > MD, DAIT > 234-803-302-5287 > http://www.dait-ng.com > Cisco Networks, Network Security & Quality of Service > DAIT Linux Enterprise Network Servers, Web Portal Projects > Broadband Internet Deployment & ISP Consultancy > View Olugbenga Oyebande's profile > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:46:55 -0500 > From: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> > To: Anthony Sequeira <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My Story CCIE#35355 > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Hahahaha. > > Regards, > Jay McMickle- CCIE #35355 > Sent from iJay > > On May 11, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Anthony Sequeira > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am also offended since I am very feminine. > > > > > > On May 11, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Maureen Maina wrote: > > > >> "Well Marko the good news is there is less than a 1% chance any woman is > >> reading this list " > >> hey, I heard that !! > >> Congrats Jay! > >> > >> Mo > >> > >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Thomas Raabo - Zitcom A/S > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > >>> :) true... > >>> > >>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > >>> Fra: [email protected] [mailto: > >>> [email protected]] P? vegne af Marko Milivojevic > >>> Sendt: 10. maj 2012 04:23 > >>> Til: marc abel > >>> Cc: [email protected] > >>> Emne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My Story CCIE#35355 > >>> > >>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:06 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Well Marko the good news is there is less than a 1% chance any woman > >>>> is reading this list. The bad news is your wife is way out of your > >>>> league so she may leave you anyway. :) > >>> > >>> :-)))) > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > >>> visit www.ipexpert.com > >>> > >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >>> > >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > >>> visit www.ipexpert.com > >>> > >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >>> > >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > >> visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >> > >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 17:00:30 -0500 > From: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> > To: Imran Ali <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] RIP HOLD DOWN TIMER > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > This should help you- > > http://blog.ine.com/2010/04/15/how-basic-are-rip-timers-test-your-knowledge-now/ > > > Regards, > Jay McMickle- CCIE #35355 > Sent from iJay > > On May 11, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Imran Ali <[email protected]> wrote: > > > hi all > > > > i am totally confused over rip hold down timer . its default is 180 seconds > > . however router waits only for 60 seconds before removing / flushing the > > route from the RIB > > > > for example ...if X route goes down...and after 180 sec invalid timer is > > over ...now starts hold down timer .....but immediately after 60 seconds > > the router flushes it out .. so ideally hold down timer should be at > > maximum 60 seconds..? > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:15:36 -0400 > From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > To: Imran Ali <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] catalyst standard vs enhanced image > capable switches > Message-ID: <-8616797633784961368@unknownmsgid> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > What switch platform? > > Bob > -- > Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. > > On May 11, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Imran Ali <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > is their a link that gives me exact features set not covered in catalyst > > swithches with STD images vs ENHANCED images ? > > > > wanted to ask , as offcourse i may by mistake by an STD capable image > > switch for ccie home lab :-) > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:18:38 -0400 > From: Debra Taylor <[email protected]> > To: Anthony Sequeira <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My Story CCIE#35355 > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > What? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 11, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Anthony Sequeira > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am also offended since I am very feminine. > > > > > > On May 11, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Maureen Maina wrote: > > > >> "Well Marko the good news is there is less than a 1% chance any woman is > >> reading this list " > >> hey, I heard that !! > >> Congrats Jay! > >> > >> Mo > >> > >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Thomas Raabo - Zitcom A/S > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > >>> :) true... > >>> > >>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > >>> Fra: [email protected] [mailto: > >>> [email protected]] P? vegne af Marko Milivojevic > >>> Sendt: 10. maj 2012 04:23 > >>> Til: marc abel > >>> Cc: [email protected] > >>> Emne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My Story CCIE#35355 > >>> > >>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:06 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Well Marko the good news is there is less than a 1% chance any woman > >>>> is reading this list. The bad news is your wife is way out of your > >>>> league so she may leave you anyway. :) > >>> > >>> :-)))) > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > >>> visit www.ipexpert.com > >>> > >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >>> > >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > >>> visit www.ipexpert.com > >>> > >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >>> > >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > >> visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >> > >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 76, Issue 40 > *************************************** _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
