The point for the G0/2 on CAT1 towards R2 is so you can switch between SFP and 
Copper. Why? I never figured that out. Maybe from the old days when UDLD was 
for fiber only?

Maybe IPX can explain...?

Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
Sent from iJay

On Apr 3, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have changed the g0/0 on R2 to fa0/0 on all of my configs before I put them 
> in.  I have not run into a problem yet and I have been through vol 1, some of 
> 2, and some of 3.
>  
> I have also put in the OWLE configs in without issue.
>  
> Hope that helps.
>  
> Nick
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Ryan Hanly <[email protected]>
> To: CCIE IPExpert <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 12:58 PM
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPExpert hardware for labs
> 
> Looking at the Base connectivity diagram, R2 has a Gig0/2 connecting to Cat1 
> on Gig0/0.
> May sound like an obvious question but is there any significance of the 
> Gig0/2 interface? 
> I ask this because I have pretty much got my own rack, but need to get this 
> bit resolved. 
> Would prefer not to spend the money if not needed.
> 
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to