Hi Marko,
Here's my dumb way of getting 2 ospf processes to communicate on the same
router without redistribution but whether or not its actually something
useful is another story :)
#ospftest.net
autostart = False
[localhost]
workingdir = /home/adam/cisco/work
ghostios = true
mmap = true
[[3725]]
image = /opt/ios/unzipped/c3725-adventerprisek9-mz.124-15.T14.bin
WIC0/0 = WIC-2T
ram = 256
idlepc = 0x60c08728
[[ROUTER R1]]
model = 3725
console = 2001
f0/0 = R2 f0/0
[[ROUTER R2]]
model = 3725
console = 2002
s0/0 = R2 s0/1
f0/1 = R3 f0/1
[[ROUTER R3]]
model = 3725
console = 2003
hostname R1
interface Loopback0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 10.1.12.1 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 1
network 10.1.12.1 0.0.0.0 area 1
hostname R2
ip vrf OSPF2
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
!
interface Loopback1
ip vrf forwarding OSPF2
ip address 22.22.22.22 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 10.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface Serial0/0
ip address 10.1.22.2 255.255.255.0
clock rate 64000
!
interface Serial0/1
ip vrf forwarding OSPF2
ip address 10.1.22.22 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip vrf forwarding OSPF2
ip address 10.1.23.2 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
router ospf 2 vrf OSPF2
log-adjacency-changes
network 10.1.22.22 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 10.1.23.2 0.0.0.0 area 3
network 22.22.22.22 0.0.0.0 area 3
!
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 1
network 10.1.12.2 0.0.0.0 area 1
network 10.1.22.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
!
hostname R3
interface Loopback0
ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 10.1.23.3 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
network 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 area 3
network 10.1.23.3 0.0.0.0 area 3
R2#sh cdp nei
Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater
Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Capability Platform Port ID
R2 Ser 0/0 177 R S I 3725 Ser 0/1
R2 Ser 0/1 177 R S I 3725 Ser 0/0
R3 Fas 0/1 150 R S I 3725 Fas 0/1
R1 Fas 0/0 170 R S I 3725 Fas 0/0
R2#sh ip ospf int brie
Interface PID Area IP Address/Mask Cost State Nbrs F/C
Se0/0 1 0 10.1.22.2/24 64 P2P 1/1
Fa0/0 1 1 10.1.12.2/24 10 BDR 1/1
Lo0 1 1 2.2.2.2/32 1 LOOP 0/0
Se0/1 2 0 10.1.22.22/24 64 P2P 1/1
Fa0/1 2 3 10.1.23.2/24 10 BDR 1/1
Lo1 2 3 22.22.22.22/32 1 LOOP 0/0
R2#sh ip ospf nei
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
22.22.22.22 0 FULL/ - 00:00:35 10.1.22.22 Serial0/0
1.1.1.1 1 FULL/DR 00:00:33 10.1.12.1
FastEthernet0/0
2.2.2.2 0 FULL/ - 00:00:35 10.1.22.2 Serial0/1
3.3.3.3 1 FULL/DR 00:00:39 10.1.23.3
FastEthernet0/1
R1#sh ip route ospf
2.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 2.2.2.2 [110/11] via 10.1.12.2, 00:02:22, FastEthernet0/0
3.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 3.3.3.3 [110/85] via 10.1.12.2, 00:02:22, FastEthernet0/0
22.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 22.22.22.22 [110/75] via 10.1.12.2, 00:02:22, FastEthernet0/0
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets
O IA 10.1.23.0 [110/84] via 10.1.12.2, 00:02:22, FastEthernet0/0
O IA 10.1.22.0 [110/74] via 10.1.12.2, 00:02:22, FastEthernet0/0
R1#ping 3.3.3.3 so 1.1.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 3.3.3.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 1.1.1.1
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/8/12 ms
R1#trace 3.3.3.3 so 1.1.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 3.3.3.3
1 10.1.12.2 8 msec 8 msec 4 msec
2 10.1.22.22 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
3 10.1.23.3 12 msec * 16 msec
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>wrote:
> No. Two OSPF processes are separate routing domains an the only way they
> can exchange the routes is through redistribution.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>
> :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and
> brevity. ::
>
> On Mar 27, 2012, at 7:27, naveen bhat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there any other way to route between two OSPF processes apart from
> doing mutual redistribution between the two processes or may be to
> introduce another routing protocol (either eigrp or rip v2) in between the
> two and then do redistribution in between rip & ospf and vice versa.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
