Thanks Michael. But I think you're forgetting that NSSA areas by definition don't allow type 5 LSA to enter the area, hence the whole reason for the type 7 LSA.
You are correct about the type 3 LSAs though (expcept of course the default route which is advertised as a type 3 LSA). I'd still argue that it doesn't say either way so both configs are valid, but I do see where you are coming from. Jason On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Michael Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello J D'Silva, > > I agree on the statement you have below but since the task doesn't say > anything about taking away LSA's 3 - 5 I would have to say that I would > enter the nssa default-information-originate command. > > > > > Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:26:53 -0600 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 Lab 11 Task 11.2 > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I'm looking for opinions on the task mentioned in the subject. The task > > roughly translates to "Configure an NSSA area and inject a default route > > into only that area". The DSG uses the config: > > > > area 4 nssa default-information-originate > > > > But when I did this yesterday I instead used: > > > > area 4 nssa no-summary > > > > This task, or any other, doesn't place any other restrictions on what > types > > of LSAs can enter the area so I'm thinking that both configs are equally > > valid given the criteria. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
