Hammer,

You are not way off, just that the same behavior is seen even if I add "sw
mode access" and "sw noneg" on the Cat port. And no... it does not form a
trunk with the router port either way, nothin in the "show int trunk". So it
seems this access + voice vlan trick mentioned in the DSG does not work on
the IOS version used in ProctorLabs.

Thanks

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:08 PM, -Hammer- <[email protected]> wrote:

> Daniel,
>      Maybe I'm missing something here. On your config the switchport is NOT
> in access mode. You have the switch access VLAN set to 56. But you do not
> have it explicitly defined to access only so it will negotiate a trunk if
> it
> sees a trunking protocol passed to it from the router. On the router, you
> are defining encapsulation dot1q on the subinterface so you will attempt to
> negotiate a trunk. Are you sure the interface on the switch has not come up
> in trunking mode? "sho int trunk" will tell you.
>
> On the router config provided. F0/0 is not tagged. On the switch the access
> VLAN is 56. So if there is a trunk between them, the router side would pass
> anything regarding 140.10.56.0/24 on VLAN1. The switch side will pass
> anything regarding 140.10.56.0/24 on VLAN56. So they will never see each
> other. Does this makes sense? Or am I way off? I'm glad you got it working
> either way.
>
>
> ####################################################################
> R6 fa0/0 ---------------- fa0/6 Cat2
>
> R6:
>
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 140.10.56.6 255.255.255.0
> duplex auto
> speed auto
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0.76
> encapsulation dot1Q 76
> ip address 140.10.76.6 255.255.255.0
>
>
> Cat2:
>
> interface FastEthernet0/6
>  switchport access vlan 56
>  switchport voice vlan 76
>  spanning-tree portfast
> !
> interface Vlan56
>  ip address 140.10.56.12 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Vlan76
>  ip address 140.10.76.12 255.255.255.0
> ####################################################################
>
>
>
> -Hammer-
>
> "I was a normal American nerd."
> -Jack Herer
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Gheorghe
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:39 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB 2 Lab 9 voice vlan
>
> @Hammer - The .56.x subnet is not tagged but the switch port is in access
> mode so it shoud work.
>
> @Tyson - Most likely that is the explanation, some code issues.
>
> Anyway, I broke the rules a little bit and used a trunk with untagged
> native
> vlan 56 on that switch port so I could carry on with the lab, so case
> closed
> :)
>
> Thanks for all the feedback.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Hammer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >  But on the router the .56.x subnet is not tagged with the proper VLAN
> tag.
> >
> >
> >  -Hammer-
> >
> > "I was a normal American nerd."
> > -Jack Herer
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to