But on the router the .56.x subnet is not tagged with the proper VLAN tag.
-Hammer- "I was a normal American nerd." -Jack Herer On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Daniel Gheorghe <[email protected] > wrote: > The behavior is the same if the Cat port is dynamic or not. The strange > thing is that the 56 vlan has connectivity if I remove the voice vlan from > the port. I can't understand this. > > The restrictions of the task include all the vlans being tagged (so vlan > dot1g tag native) and only the port-channels between the switches should be > seen as trunks, So the ideea of the voice vlan appeared in order to avoid > using a trunk on Cat2 fa0/6. > > Also I confirm that the behavior is the same even if we use 2 subinterfaces > on the router (although the task prohibits the modification of the router > interface addressing). > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:24 AM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Actually from your output you are set to dynamic on f0/6 so it probably > is > > trunking. Can you confirm? If so you can either set the native vlan to 56 > on > > the the trunk, or change the router side to a sub-interface as I > suggested > > before. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
