Weird that you are peering with 3.3.3.1 when that network isn't defined. The rest of the basic config looks good- the issue requires more config info from at least two peers to determine the issue.
Regards, Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP Sent from my iPhone http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com On Jan 9, 2011, at 4:09 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. OSPF question (Paul Kim) > 2. Re: Recent Attempt (Anthony Hudgins) > 3. Re: OSPF question (Jay Taylor) > 4. Re: OSPF question (Paul Kim) > 5. Re: OSPF question (Jay Taylor) > 6. Re: Lab environment query (Dave Blank) > Hi experts, > > Probably I have miss-understand some piece of OSPF. > Can you please let me know why r1 doesn't adverrise networks defined > under ospf statment. > > r1#sh run | s router ospf > router ospf 1 > router-id 1.1.1.1 > log-adjacency-changes > network 43.34.32.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 > network 55.55.55.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 > network 66.66.66.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 > network 172.16.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 > > r1#sh ip int brief | ex una > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status > Protocol > FastEthernet0/0 3.3.3.1 YES NVRAM up > up > FastEthernet0/1 55.55.55.4 YES NVRAM up > up > Serial0/3/0 172.16.0.1 YES NVRAM up > up > Vlan10 66.66.66.1 YES manual up > up > Loopback87 43.34.32.1 YES NVRAM up > up > > r1#sh ip ospf nei > > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface > 3.3.3.3 1 FULL/DR 00:00:30 172.16.0.3 Serial0/3/0 > > r1#sh ip ospf database self > > OSPF Router with ID (1.1.1.1) (Process ID 1) > > Router Link States (Area 0) > > Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count > 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.1 574 0x80000009 0x00CF89 4 > r1# > > > Thanks, > Paul > > I took my exam in RTP, NC. The proctor was very nice and helpful. With R&S, > there is only a two-hour troubleshooting section and a six-hour > configuration. If you finish the troubleshooting early, you can jump right > into the configuration section. I took both of my attempts in RTP so I can't > compare to anywhere else, but RTP has a nice facility (not to cold, not to > hot, lots of free soda). I think it was 6 of us taking the lab (1 voice, 1 > SP, 4 R&S) > > --- On Sun, 1/9/11, Max Pierson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Max Pierson <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Recent Attempt > To: "Anthony Hudgins" <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, January 9, 2011, 1:40 PM > > > Best of luck to you!! Hope you reply with 5 digit number when you get your > results :) > > > BTW, where did you take your 2 exams?? Is the testing facility(s) nice > (comfortable station, all needed materials were present, helpful proctors and > I _assume_ you did not have any OEQ's?? > > > I think the list likes feedback (or at least I do) as I am about to start > picking out a date to schedule my lab. > > > Regards, > M > > > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Anthony Hudgins <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I just completed my second attempt at the R&S on Friday (Jan 7th). They are > not going to grade the labs until midnight on Sunday. So, I should know the > results on Monday morning. I feel good about the configuration section, but > the troubleshooting section, I only completed 8 out of 10 tickets. We only > need 80%, but I have been going over what I should have done to get all 10 > tickets completed. I did not see anything in the lab that I have not seen > before. My only issue is with troubleshooting and I like to stick with an > issue until it is completely fixed. I focused too much time on my tickets in > the beginning and at the end, I was rushing. If I have to re-take, I was > thinking about rescheduling as soon as possible. > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > > What's the output of a 'show ip ospf database router 1.1.1.1' on R1? > > > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Paul Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi experts, >> >> Probably I have miss-understand some piece of OSPF. >> Can you please let me know why r1 doesn't adverrise networks defined >> under ospf statment. >> >> r1#sh run | s router ospf >> router ospf 1 >> router-id 1.1.1.1 >> log-adjacency-changes >> network 43.34.32.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 >> network 55.55.55.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 >> network 66.66.66.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 >> network 172.16.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 >> >> r1#sh ip int brief | ex una >> Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status >> Protocol >> FastEthernet0/0 3.3.3.1 YES NVRAM up >> up >> FastEthernet0/1 55.55.55.4 YES NVRAM up >> up >> Serial0/3/0 172.16.0.1 YES NVRAM up >> up >> Vlan10 66.66.66.1 YES manual up >> up >> Loopback87 43.34.32.1 YES NVRAM up >> up >> >> r1#sh ip ospf nei >> >> Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface >> 3.3.3.3 1 FULL/DR 00:00:30 172.16.0.3 >> Serial0/3/0 >> >> r1#sh ip ospf database self >> >> OSPF Router with ID (1.1.1.1) (Process ID 1) >> >> Router Link States (Area 0) >> >> Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count >> 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.1 574 0x80000009 0x00CF89 4 >> r1# >> >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> > > Hi Jay, > > The output at r3, the adjacent router seems OK as follows. > > r3#sh ip ospf database router 1.1.1.1 > > OSPF Router with ID (3.3.3.3) (Process ID 1) > > Router Link States (Area 0) > > Adv Router is not-reachable > LS age: 48 > Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) > LS Type: Router Links > Link State ID: 1.1.1.1 > Advertising Router: 1.1.1.1 > LS Seq Number: 8000000D > Checksum: 0xC78D > Length: 72 > Number of Links: 4 > > Link connected to: a Stub Network > (Link ID) Network/subnet number: 43.34.32.0 > (Link Data) Network Mask: 255.255.255.0 > Number of TOS metrics: 0 > TOS 0 Metrics: 1 > > Link connected to: a Stub Network > (Link ID) Network/subnet number: 66.66.66.0 > (Link Data) Network Mask: 255.255.255.0 > Number of TOS metrics: 0 > TOS 0 Metrics: 1 > > Link connected to: a Stub Network > (Link ID) Network/subnet number: 55.55.55.0 > (Link Data) Network Mask: 255.255.255.0 > Number of TOS metrics: 0 > TOS 0 Metrics: 1 > > Link connected to: a Transit Network > (Link ID) Designated Router address: 172.16.0.3 > (Link Data) Router Interface address: 172.16.0.1 > Number of TOS metrics: 0 > TOS 0 Metrics: 64 > > > r3#sh ip route 66.66.66.0 > % Network not in table > r3#sh ip route 55.55.55.0 > % Network not in table > r3#sh ip route 43.34.32.0 > % Network not in table > r3#sh ip ospf nei > > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface > 1.1.1.1 0 FULL/ - 00:00:32 172.16.0.1 > Serial0/1/0.26 > > It seems that somehow r3 doesn't take the r1's LSA into its RIB. > > Thanks, > Paul > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> What's the output of a 'show ip ospf database router 1.1.1.1' on R1? >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Paul Kim <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi experts, >>> >>> Probably I have miss-understand some piece of OSPF. >>> Can you please let me know why r1 doesn't adverrise networks defined >>> under ospf statment. >>> >>> r1#sh run | s router ospf >>> router ospf 1 >>> router-id 1.1.1.1 >>> log-adjacency-changes >>> network 43.34.32.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 >>> network 55.55.55.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 >>> network 66.66.66.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 >>> network 172.16.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 >>> >>> r1#sh ip int brief | ex una >>> Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status >>> Protocol >>> FastEthernet0/0 3.3.3.1 YES NVRAM up >>> up >>> FastEthernet0/1 55.55.55.4 YES NVRAM up >>> up >>> Serial0/3/0 172.16.0.1 YES NVRAM up >>> up >>> Vlan10 66.66.66.1 YES manual up >>> up >>> Loopback87 43.34.32.1 YES NVRAM up >>> up >>> >>> r1#sh ip ospf nei >>> >>> Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address >>> Interface >>> 3.3.3.3 1 FULL/DR 00:00:30 172.16.0.3 >>> Serial0/3/0 >>> >>> r1#sh ip ospf database self >>> >>> OSPF Router with ID (1.1.1.1) (Process ID 1) >>> >>> Router Link States (Area 0) >>> >>> Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count >>> 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.1 574 0x80000009 0x00CF89 4 >>> r1# >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Paul >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > > There's a good clue in that output: > > "Adv Router is not-reachable" > > Seeing that it's a frame relay interface you might have network type > mismatch or misconfigured pvcs: > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a008009481a.shtml > > > > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Paul Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Jay, >> >> The output at r3, the adjacent router seems OK as follows. >> >> r3#sh ip ospf database router 1.1.1.1 >> >> OSPF Router with ID (3.3.3.3) (Process ID 1) >> >> Router Link States (Area 0) >> >> Adv Router is not-reachable >> LS age: 48 >> Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) >> LS Type: Router Links >> Link State ID: 1.1.1.1 >> Advertising Router: 1.1.1.1 >> LS Seq Number: 8000000D >> Checksum: 0xC78D >> Length: 72 >> Number of Links: 4 >> >> Link connected to: a Stub Network >> (Link ID) Network/subnet number: 43.34.32.0 >> (Link Data) Network Mask: 255.255.255.0 >> Number of TOS metrics: 0 >> TOS 0 Metrics: 1 >> >> Link connected to: a Stub Network >> (Link ID) Network/subnet number: 66.66.66.0 >> (Link Data) Network Mask: 255.255.255.0 >> Number of TOS metrics: 0 >> TOS 0 Metrics: 1 >> >> Link connected to: a Stub Network >> (Link ID) Network/subnet number: 55.55.55.0 >> (Link Data) Network Mask: 255.255.255.0 >> Number of TOS metrics: 0 >> TOS 0 Metrics: 1 >> >> Link connected to: a Transit Network >> (Link ID) Designated Router address: 172.16.0.3 >> (Link Data) Router Interface address: 172.16.0.1 >> Number of TOS metrics: 0 >> TOS 0 Metrics: 64 >> >> >> r3#sh ip route 66.66.66.0 >> % Network not in table >> r3#sh ip route 55.55.55.0 >> % Network not in table >> r3#sh ip route 43.34.32.0 >> % Network not in table >> r3#sh ip ospf nei >> >> Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface >> 1.1.1.1 0 FULL/ - 00:00:32 172.16.0.1 >> Serial0/1/0.26 >> >> It seems that somehow r3 doesn't take the r1's LSA into its RIB. >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> What's the output of a 'show ip ospf database router 1.1.1.1' on R1? >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Paul Kim <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi experts, >>>> >>>> Probably I have miss-understand some piece of OSPF. >>>> Can you please let me know why r1 doesn't adverrise networks defined >>>> under ospf statment. >>>> >>>> r1#sh run | s router ospf >>>> router ospf 1 >>>> router-id 1.1.1.1 >>>> log-adjacency-changes >>>> network 43.34.32.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 >>>> network 55.55.55.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 >>>> network 66.66.66.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 >>>> network 172.16.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 >>>> >>>> r1#sh ip int brief | ex una >>>> Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status >>>> Protocol >>>> FastEthernet0/0 3.3.3.1 YES NVRAM up >>>> up >>>> FastEthernet0/1 55.55.55.4 YES NVRAM up >>>> up >>>> Serial0/3/0 172.16.0.1 YES NVRAM up >>>> up >>>> Vlan10 66.66.66.1 YES manual up >>>> up >>>> Loopback87 43.34.32.1 YES NVRAM up >>>> up >>>> >>>> r1#sh ip ospf nei >>>> >>>> Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address >>>> Interface >>>> 3.3.3.3 1 FULL/DR 00:00:30 172.16.0.3 >>>> Serial0/3/0 >>>> >>>> r1#sh ip ospf database self >>>> >>>> OSPF Router with ID (1.1.1.1) (Process ID 1) >>>> >>>> Router Link States (Area 0) >>>> >>>> Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link >> count >>>> 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.1 574 0x80000009 0x00CF89 4 >>>> r1# >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Paul >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> >> > > Here is a link to the demo video on the Cisco Learning Network: > https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/static/video-wp/CCIE_RS_v4_Lab_Exam_Demo_640x480-v2.htm > > -Dave > > > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Paul Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Marko, >> >> Good to know. >> >> I have OWLE scheduled in Sanjose in March :-) >> >> Paul >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Steve - we have been using this interface in our ILT and OWLE >>> bootcamps for moths now :-). We have very good feedback from students >>> about it. Many say it helped them a lot when they finally went to the >>> lab. >>> >>> Now, for the questions... >>> >>> #1 No, but it shouldn't matter. IPexpert topology has more devices >>> than the real lab and cabling is somewhat different. This should not >>> be a problem for experts. >>> >>> #2 Terminal is PuTTY and you have access to all Windows Calculator >> functions. >>> >>> #3 Everything is digital. No printed material is provided. >>> >>> #4 You will have plenty of paper and pens to use during the lab. >>> >>> -- >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >>> >>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >>> >>> Mailto: [email protected] >>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 05:31, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> I think the terminal is putty and I thought ipexpert was developing a >> web interface that is similar for one of their bootcamps?? >>>> >>>> Michael Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Paul, >>>> >>>> I've never been to the lab, but most of what you ask is not NDA. >>>> >>>> 2) Yes, the terminal is Windows. The calculator is available and >> includes >>>> scientific mode. >>>> >>>> 3) All diagrams are on screen. I don't know what you will get, but I >> expect >>>> that it is NDA. >>>> >>>> 4) You will have pens and paper to draw on. >>>> >>>> There is a video on CLN of the test interface, and I highly suggest it. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Paul Kim <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> Can anyone tell me about the lab environment in San Jose? ( If this >>>>> is not a NDA obviously) >>>>> >>>>> I have some questions as follow. >>>>> >>>>> 1. Are the lab devices and connections exactly as same as in >>>>> IPExpert's BLS workbook lab diagram like 7 routers, 3 BB >>>>> routers,1*C3550, 3*C3560, 2 links from every Cat switch to the other 3 >>>>> switches, cat1 and cat2 has a Gig connection, and etc? >>>>> >>>>> 2. Does a lab terminal is on Windows OS? Does it provide calculator as >>>>> well? If so, is programmer mode calcuator available? >>>>> >>>>> 3. Do they provide routing and switching connections tables as well as >>>>> worksheets on papers or just on a soft copy on the screen? >>>>> >>>>> 4. Do they provide a notepad and a pen on which I can draw pricures or >>>>> some memo quickly? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot! >>>>> >>>>> Paul >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> >>>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any >> attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may >> contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, >> use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this >> was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and >> destroy all copies of the original message. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
