Thanks to everyone On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Matt Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Correct... this is why you should not use an interface as a next-hop > for Ethernet :) > > Also, if for whatever strange reason you are using proxy-arp you will > see arp entries for the destination (remote subnet) IP address bound > to the next-hop mac address on the local subnet. > > Cheers, > Matt > > CCIE #22386 > CCSI #31207 > > On 7 January 2011 00:33, Jonathan Fernatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > The router will have ARP for devices on the same IP subnet attached to > its > > ethernet interfaces. It could also have ARP entries for devices not > directly > > connected assuming you had another device doing proxy ARP on the segment > and > > a static route pointing to the exit interface only. (IE ip route 1.2.3.0 > > 255.255.255.0 fastethernet0/0) > > > > Others on the list may know of other circumstances. > > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:13 AM, vishal bhugra <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone > >> > >> I have a stupid question but I don't have answer to it so disturbing you > >> guys > >> > >> Do router should have ARP entry for every route, learned by any mean. > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks®ards > >> > >> Vishal > >> > >> Best way to predict the future ..... is to create it > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > >> visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > -- Thanks®ards Vishal +91-9971116066 +33 633537973 Best way to predict the future ..... is to create it _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
