Correct... this is why you should not use an interface as a next-hop for Ethernet :)
Also, if for whatever strange reason you are using proxy-arp you will see arp entries for the destination (remote subnet) IP address bound to the next-hop mac address on the local subnet. Cheers, Matt CCIE #22386 CCSI #31207 On 7 January 2011 00:33, Jonathan Fernatt <[email protected]> wrote: > The router will have ARP for devices on the same IP subnet attached to its > ethernet interfaces. It could also have ARP entries for devices not directly > connected assuming you had another device doing proxy ARP on the segment and > a static route pointing to the exit interface only. (IE ip route 1.2.3.0 > 255.255.255.0 fastethernet0/0) > > Others on the list may know of other circumstances. > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:13 AM, vishal bhugra <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi everyone >> >> I have a stupid question but I don't have answer to it so disturbing you >> guys >> >> Do router should have ARP entry for every route, learned by any mean. >> >> -- >> Thanks®ards >> >> Vishal >> >> Best way to predict the future ..... is to create it >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
