there was a passive int in r4 even I removed that it did not help.When I make ospf distance to 171 I started to see the prefix in r6 route table.but I think still I am doing something wrong.Without changeing distance it has to work
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Mustafa Yadav <[email protected]>wrote: > yes r3 is spoke and r5 is hub in frame relay.I attached r4 r5 and r6 > config. > > > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Adrian Brayton <[email protected]>wrote: > >> If you did the redistribution correctly, it should be in R6s table as an >> EX (170) route... Does this involve Frame-Relay? When you redistribute >> EIGRP==>OSPF, you are adding the "subnets" keyword and OSPF==>EIGRP adding a >> metric? >> >> Can you please send your configs? >> >> >> >> >> On May 23, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Mustafa Yadav wrote: >> >> > hi all >> > >> > >> > r3****ospf***** r5******eigrp****r4*****eigrp*****r6 >> > >> > >> > According to the below diagram I am trying to redistribute r3 loopback >> into r6.R5 talks eigrp and ospf as well. in r4 I can see that it has >> learned this ip adress via ospf (even it is not shown there is an ospf >> connection between r3 and r4).In R4 when I execute sh ip eigrp topology I >> see that 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible which is normal since this prefix >> is not in the routing table and learned from another protocol.But how can I >> put this prefix into r6 router table? >> > >> > many thanks >> > _______________________________________________ >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
