Hi,

About Oracle Cloud: it seems the beefy ARM64 machine was available only for
the trial period.
The Always Free tier allows up to 4 CPU (@2.8GHz Ampere Altra 80), 24 GB of
RAM, 45GB disk and 4 Gbps network bandwidth. One can choose between Oracle
EL, Ubuntu and CentOS - several versions of each.
For x86_64 VMs the Free tier allows up to 2 VMs with 1 CPU (2.0 GHz AMD
EPYC™ 7551 (Naples)), 1GB of RAM and 0.48 Gbps bandwidth. Same choice for
OSes.

I've just setup self-hosted runner on ARM64 VM with 1 CPU and 6GB RAM. The
Apache Avro Rust GHA workflows are around 70% slower than the public GHA
runners:
- public GHA runner builds Avro in 3 mins
- the self-hosted runner in 5 mins

More info at:
https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/FreeTier/freetier_topic-Always_Free_Resources.htm#resources

Soon I will try the modified GHA runner by Apache Airflow.
Once I see it working I will write a blog about all this.

Regards,
Martin


On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:55 PM Craig Hunt <m...@craighunt.us> wrote:

> Great, thanks!
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:46 PM Gavin McDonald <gmcdon...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Craig,
> >
> > This meeting (and most builds meetings) is open to all, I have added
> > you to the guest list.
> >
> > Keep an eye out on Thursday where I'll add the meeting id  to the builds@
> > list
> > and the wiki page.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 6:12 PM Craig Hunt <m...@craighunt.us> wrote:
> >
> > > Gavin, I am a new potential volunteer with a strong interest in ASF
> > > GitBox CI/CD build operations and would like to attend your meeting
> > > strictly as an observer (knowledge gain exercise).
> > > Greg Stein confirmed by email that he thought it may be OK for me to
> > > attend if the meeting was public.
> > > However, I am not clear if the meeting is public, as I first thought,
> > > if it is can I be added as a guest observer? I cannot add myself on
> > > Confluence it seems.
> > > I know there are good reasons for security now and I have NO essential
> > > need as a potential volunteer to attend, so please let me know your
> > > policy preference.
> > > Best regards, Craig Richard Hunt
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:15 AM Gavin McDonald <gmcdon...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Reminder to all that the builds@ meeting will take place this week,
> in 2
> > > > days.
> > > >
> > > > Hope you can all make it!
> > > >
> > > > Gav...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:58 AM Gavin McDonald <gmcdon...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All.
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems next week is better for some so I'll push this out to the
> > > 11th.
> > > > >
> > > > > HTH
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 4:08 PM Josh Fischer <j...@joshfischer.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I'm interested in participating.  The Heron project is hitting
> limits
> > > > >> with TravisCI, I'd like to find a way to make our process better
> > > whether
> > > > >> it's with Jenkins/GA or something else. Next week would be better
> for
> > > me,
> > > > >> if we can push it back.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 8:49 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> I updated the graphs. I think things have changed a lot since
> > > December
> > > > >>> last
> > > > >>> year.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> There are no absurd-high (and way above the limits) peaks of
> > > workflows in
> > > > >>> progress for some projects (e.g. Pulsar). However a number of
> apache
> > > > >>> repos
> > > > >>> using GA grows steadily. Number of workflows "queued" fluctuates
> for
> > > many
> > > > >>> projects and for some projects (spark) it seems it steadily
> grows.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Observation from the Airflow side (and I think lack of
> "escalation"
> > > > >>> indicates that other projects have the same) is that we stopped
> > > observing
> > > > >>> prolonged periods where a lot of jobs are queued for a long time
> > > (many
> > > > >>> hours). One thing is that we moved a lot of the workload to our
> > > > >>> self-hosted
> > > > >>> runners - when it comes to public runners, there are short peaks
> of
> > > > >>> queued
> > > > >>> jobs but they seem to catch-up relatively quickly (max few
> hours).
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> When I see those graph, my interpretation is that Github got a
> lot
> > > better
> > > > >>> queuing algorithms.Previously it seemed to be possible by a
> single
> > > > >>> project
> > > > >>> to take over the queue and get the number of "in progress" way
> higher
> > > > >>> than
> > > > >>> the 150 jobs limit, and I think that effectively blocked other
> > > projects
> > > > >>> for
> > > > >>> a long time. Currently it seems that the algorithm they have
> > > balances out
> > > > >>> the workload between projects much better - and if there are
> projects
> > > > >>> that
> > > > >>> have more and more workloads, it impacts their own queue size
> much
> > > more
> > > > >>> than queuing time of other projects - see Spark's average number
> of
> > > > >>> queued
> > > > >>> workflows.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The graphs IMHO are much healthier than they were a year ago.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I wonder what is the perception of others :).
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> BTW. It would be great if we could move it by a week - this week
> is
> > > > >>> shorter
> > > > >>> for many and some have longer holidays (1st of Nov is a holiday
> in a
> > > > >>> number
> > > > >>> of countries).
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:13 PM Gavin McDonald <
> gmcdon...@apache.org>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> > Hi All,
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > I think it is past time to have another meeting.
> > > > >>> > The stresses and strains of our current CI makes me think we
> should
> > > > >>> have
> > > > >>> > another discussion.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > Link to the cwiki page:
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Builds+Agenda+2021-11-04
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > If this week doesn't work then we can postpone until next week.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > HTH
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > --
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > *Gavin McDonald*
> > > > >>> > Systems Administrator
> > > > >>> > ASF Infrastructure Team
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > *Gavin McDonald*
> > > > > Systems Administrator
> > > > > ASF Infrastructure Team
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > *Gavin McDonald*
> > > > Systems Administrator
> > > > ASF Infrastructure Team
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > *Gavin McDonald*
> > Systems Administrator
> > ASF Infrastructure Team
>

Reply via email to