Hi All.

It seems next week is better for some so I'll push this out to the 11th.

HTH

On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 4:08 PM Josh Fischer <j...@joshfischer.io> wrote:

> I'm interested in participating.  The Heron project is hitting limits with
> TravisCI, I'd like to find a way to make our process better whether
> it's with Jenkins/GA or something else. Next week would be better for me,
> if we can push it back.
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 8:49 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
>> I updated the graphs. I think things have changed a lot since December
>> last
>> year.
>>
>> There are no absurd-high (and way above the limits) peaks of workflows in
>> progress for some projects (e.g. Pulsar). However a number of apache repos
>> using GA grows steadily. Number of workflows "queued" fluctuates for many
>> projects and for some projects (spark) it seems it steadily grows.
>>
>> Observation from the Airflow side (and I think lack of "escalation"
>> indicates that other projects have the same) is that we stopped observing
>> prolonged periods where a lot of jobs are queued for a long time (many
>> hours). One thing is that we moved a lot of the workload to our
>> self-hosted
>> runners - when it comes to public runners, there are short peaks of queued
>> jobs but they seem to catch-up relatively quickly (max few hours).
>>
>> When I see those graph, my interpretation is that Github got a lot better
>> queuing algorithms.Previously it seemed to be possible by a single project
>> to take over the queue and get the number of "in progress" way higher than
>> the 150 jobs limit, and I think that effectively blocked other projects
>> for
>> a long time. Currently it seems that the algorithm they have balances out
>> the workload between projects much better - and if there are projects that
>> have more and more workloads, it impacts their own queue size much more
>> than queuing time of other projects - see Spark's average number of queued
>> workflows.
>>
>> The graphs IMHO are much healthier than they were a year ago.
>>
>> I wonder what is the perception of others :).
>>
>> BTW. It would be great if we could move it by a week - this week is
>> shorter
>> for many and some have longer holidays (1st of Nov is a holiday in a
>> number
>> of countries).
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:13 PM Gavin McDonald <gmcdon...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I think it is past time to have another meeting.
>> > The stresses and strains of our current CI makes me think we should have
>> > another discussion.
>> >
>> > Link to the cwiki page:
>> >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Builds+Agenda+2021-11-04
>> >
>> > If this week doesn't work then we can postpone until next week.
>> >
>> > HTH
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > *Gavin McDonald*
>> > Systems Administrator
>> > ASF Infrastructure Team
>> >
>>
>

-- 

*Gavin McDonald*
Systems Administrator
ASF Infrastructure Team

Reply via email to