> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 13:18:12 +0300
> From: Ozkan Sezer <seze...@gmail.com>
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, bo...@kolpackov.net
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Ozkan Sezer <seze...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> wrote:
> >>> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:42:52 +0300
> >>> From: Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org>
> >>> Cc: seze...@gmail.com, bo...@kolpackov.net, bug-make@gnu.org
> >>>
> >>> > From: "Paul D. Smith" <invalid.nore...@gnu.org>
> >>> > Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:32:15 +0000
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Follow-up Comment #9, bug #27809 (project make):
> >>> >
> >>> > I've applied most of the second patch. The first patch is mostly in
> >>> > the w32
> >>> > area so maybe Eli is a better person to review it?
> >>>
> >>> I will try to do that over the next few days.
> >>
> >> I have a question regarding this patch:
> >>
> >> diff -u -p -r2.27 config.h.W32.template
> >> --- config.h.W32.template 25 Oct 2009 18:56:44 -0000 2.27
> >> +++ config.h.W32.template 5 Jul 2010 19:43:20 -0000
> >> @@ -426,7 +426,11 @@ this program. If not, see <http://www.g
> >> /* Define to `int' if <sys/types.h> does not define. */
> >> /* GCC 4.x reportedly defines pid_t. */
> >> #ifndef _PID_T_
> >> +#ifndef _WIN64
> >> #define pid_t int
> >> +#else
> >> +#define pid_t __int64
> >> +#endif
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> Why is this needed? Is there really a MinGW64 port of GCC whose
> >> version is less than 4? If MinGW64 only has GCC 4.x or later, it is
> >> supposed to define pid_t in the header files supplied with GCC.
> >> Please check.
> >>
> >
> > Yes there is: w64 is supported since gcc-4.4 (even 4.3 may
> > be used but very limited so that doesn't count) and I am really
> > amazed how people doesn't know that. So, for the record,
> > everything that I posted here are regarding gcc, not any other
> > compiler. Oh, and for the runtime, headers, etc. regarding w64-
> > gcc, go to: mingw-w64.sourceforge.net
> >
>
> Oh, oh sorry... W64 port with gcc < 4.x: That part no, there is not.
So am I right assuming that the the _WIN64 part of the above change is
not needed, because MinGW64 will use the pid_t defined in the compiler
headers?
IOW, is the following good enough to satisfy MinGW64?
/* Define to `int' if <sys/types.h> does not define. */
/* GCC 4.x reportedly defines pid_t. */
#ifndef _PID_T_
#define pid_t int
#endif
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
