I think you should re-consider this comment: "The other option is ditching LilyPad and doing a Darwin-only version of LilyPond, assuming that we can do this with suitably free components.", by David Kastrup. I don't think many people are using the limited editor LilyPad. There are a lot of better tools available (Frescobaldi). I'd rather have a native LilyPond without the *Pad, than having to compile it myself or rely on a Docker solution.
---------- Forwarded message --------- *Bart Kummel <b...@kummelweb.nl> started the conversation* "64 bit MacOS version + Apple Silicon version" *with bug-lilypond@gnu.org <bug-lilypond@gnu.org>.* On do 22 apr. 2021 at 13:21, *Bart Kummel* wrote: Hi, Apple switched off support for old 32 bit applications years ago. I'm surprised that there still isn't a 64bit Mac version of Lilypond. In the meantime, Apple has released their own silicon (the M1 processor), so I guess you should also be working on a version that runs on that hardware. I know there are work arounds, like unofficial builds (but those are outdated) and running Lilypond via Docker (but that's cumbersome). Those can only be used as temporary work arounds. Best regards, Bart Kummel _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond *Kenneth Wolcott <kennethwolc...@gmail.com> returned to.* On do 22 apr. 2021 at 17:34, *Kenneth Wolcott* wrote: Use MacPorts to build it. It works very nice. HIH, Ken _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
