> Looks like the enhancement for issue 1839 caused the slowdown. > > If we avoid the more complicated note-head.cc:internal_print() from 1839, > [...] > then input that used to double in compilation time between versions now > takes [the same time] on either .11 or .12. >
The issue 1839 patch tripled the number of named-glyph-lookups per note-head. If that is really the cause of the observed 60% increase in compile times, that would imply that LilyPond 2.14 on Windows is spending 30% of her time looking up note-head glyphs by name. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
