Quoting Pino Toscano (2013-07-22 15:57:45) > Alle martedì 9 luglio 2013, Justus Winter ha scritto: > > pidof -s returns the first matching process. Since readdir(2) on > > procfs returns the processes in ascending order, this returns the > > first process. This is more robust if there is more than one > > /sbin/init process. > > > > Currently on Hurd there are two /sbin/init processes. > > Are you sure there are two /sbin/init process around, when using > sysvinit? Back then in my experiments, I remember one /hurd/init (as of > now) and /sbin/init, and I had to fix procfs so `pidof /sbin/init` would > actually match exactly and not go into fuzzy search (which would find > /hurd/init and /sbin/init).
Sounds crazy, but yes, I'm somewhat sure: Mounting local filesystems...done. + grep init root 1 - Sslo 0:00.02 /hurd/init root=device:hd0s1 console=com0 root 6 - Sslo 0:00.01 init boot root 12 co Ssfow 0:00.00 init boot root 13 co So 0:00.01 /bin/sh /etc/init.d/rc S root 416 co Sow 0:00.03 /bin/sh /etc/init.d/mountall.sh start root 493 co So 0:00.00 grep init + pidof /sbin/init 12 6 + set +x Justus
