Roland McGrath, le Mon 26 May 2008 20:01:17 -0700, a écrit : > (The error_t usage being broken in C++ is at least not a silent change > or breakage of something that already works.)
True for us, but it does work on e.g. Linux since error_t is typedefed to int there :/ > It may also be a problem in some other C++ way I'm not aware of off > hand, for the type of EFOO not to be int. > > I'm open to suggestions. But I think we might just have to live with > C++ using (error_t) EFOO, or else supply a C++ <errno> or whatever where > there is explicitly no expectation of int-valued or cpp-usable values, > if people would actually use that. Ok, so that means we have to raise the issue at the C++ language level :/ Thanks, Samuel
