Samuel Thibault, le Tue 27 May 2008 11:01:29 +0100, a écrit : > Roland McGrath, le Mon 26 May 2008 20:01:17 -0700, a écrit : > > But I think we might just have to live with > > C++ using (error_t) EFOO, > > A friend of mine suggested to rather use error_t(EFOO), which is a bit > less dirty but still works.
(and it makes sense, as the standard says that E* are just ints). Samuel
