Roland McGrath, le Mon 26 May 2008 20:01:17 -0700, a écrit : > But I think we might just have to live with > C++ using (error_t) EFOO,
A friend of mine suggested to rather use error_t(EFOO), which is a bit less dirty but still works. > or else supply a C++ <errno> or whatever where there is explicitly > no expectation of int-valued or cpp-usable values, if people would > actually use that. That would be less easy to get accepted I guess. Samuel
