Re: notify_no_senders oddity

[Thomas Bushnell BSG]

On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:48 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG, le Mon 01 Jan 2007 12:18:17 -0800, a écrit :
> > > > >   bd->port = ipc_port_alloc_kernel ();
> > > > >   ipc_port_nsrequest (bd->port, 1, notify, &notify);
> > > > > 
> > > > >       dev = (device_t) ns->not_header.msgh_remote_port;
> 
> > The MiG converters for the various types are not identical.  
> 
> But how is the differenciation done in this case?

The mig .defs file declares a port for the argument, and when MiG
generates the server side stub, it automagically calls a function
declared for that type between the RPC reception and the server
function.

> Both types are used for the same port.

Yes, so?

Thomas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd