On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 12:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hi, > > There's something I don't understand in > i386/i386at/i386at_ds_routines.c:ds_notify() > > dev = (device_t) ns->not_header.msgh_remote_port; > > How a port can be a device_t?
A device_t is just a mach_port_t that is expected to be talking to something that implements the Mach device protocol. Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
