On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 12:30:24PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > There's something I don't understand in > i386/i386at/i386at_ds_routines.c:ds_notify() > > dev = (device_t) ns->not_header.msgh_remote_port; > > How a port can be a device_t?
In include/mach/message.h:
typedef struct {
...
mach_port_t msgh_remote_port;
...
} mach_msg_header_t;
and in include/device/device_types.h
typedef mach_port_t device_t;
I'm not totally sure of what you call a `port' in your question.
--
Richard Braun
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
