Sergio Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh, ok. Could you please help me to ask _all the things involved_ by > this...
Sorry, this is now in realm of just the same generic "tell me everything!" question. As for Mach, no, I don't have time to answer whatever unasked questions someone might implicate in Mach. I see L4 as the future, and don't see a great deal value in spending my energy on Mach. > in a couple of simple, "in the interrogative mood" and "complete with > question marks" questions? See, *you* ask the questions. You don't get *not* ask questions and then insist that people should answer the questions you haven't asked. You need to ask a fairly specific question. If the question is "can you check this in, please?" then you need to, um, ask the people who are handling checkins. It isn't Roland and me. Distressing is that you ignored the following: > I see no question here. As for the change suggested, I would want to > see some research on how this patch performs in practice. See, when I wrote that, I was assuming you would read it, rather than just use it as a way to criticize me. READ IT. Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
