El mié, 24-08-2005 a las 09:16 +0300, Ognyan Kulev escribió: > Sergio Lopez wrote: > > El mar, 23-08-2005 a las 08:49 +0300, Ognyan Kulev escribió: > >> IMHO In our case, it's best bugs and patches to be submitted to Savannah > >> <http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/hurd>. Savannah may be good or bad > >> but it's important to have easily accessible record of Hurd's problems. > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. But there are some issues (design issues > > mostly) that doesn't fit into "bug" or "patches" categories, and need to > > be discussed into the list. > > Do these fit in "Feature request" tracker? >
Maybe, or maybe not. Anyway, the features of Savannah doesn't make sense if there's not a maintainer looking at there regularly (and if they are not looking at here, bug-hurd, I doubt they will be looking at there). I look at the things in the trackers. Please report them there. And please have some patience. your patches will get looked at in due time (I'm really bussy with various other stuff right now, Marco/Neal/anyone else can look at things, and apply them to the ams-branch). _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
