El mié, 24-08-2005 a las 09:16 +0300, Ognyan Kulev escribió: > Sergio Lopez wrote: > > El mar, 23-08-2005 a las 08:49 +0300, Ognyan Kulev escribió: > >> IMHO In our case, it's best bugs and patches to be submitted to Savannah > >> <http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/hurd>. Savannah may be good or bad > >> but it's important to have easily accessible record of Hurd's problems. > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. But there are some issues (design issues > > mostly) that doesn't fit into "bug" or "patches" categories, and need to > > be discussed into the list. > > Do these fit in "Feature request" tracker? >
Maybe, or maybe not. Anyway, the features of Savannah doesn't make sense if there's not a maintainer looking at there regularly (and if they are not looking at here, bug-hurd, I doubt they will be looking at there). > Also, IMHO, having an active and fluid > > mailing list is essential for project's health. > > Yes... Most communication about the Hurd nowadays is through ##hurd or > #hug @ irc.freenode.net. > Yes, I know. But the IRC is not the proper way for all things, i.e. you can't stay there 24 hours at day, everyday, waiting for someone to connect. Specially, when is possible that the one for who you are waiting will never enter into the channel. -- Sergio Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
