On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:09:41PM +0100, Moritz Schulte wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I would say that if you recognize a situation that would make all > > further writes (to a file, to a socket) trigger another emergency > > log (or, let's say there is a significant likelihood for it), it > > would make sense for the server to log a message, and then die. > > Instead of just dying, the server could also simply disable logging > (after loggin an according message) and give the user time to fix it > (or to reboot the system).
I think that would only even more obfuscate the situation you are trying to debug. Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
