Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would say that if you recognize a situation that would make all
> further writes (to a file, to a socket) trigger another emergency
> log (or, let's say there is a significant likelihood for it), it
> would make sense for the server to log a message, and then die.
Instead of just dying, the server could also simply disable logging
(after loggin an according message) and give the user time to fix it
(or to reboot the system).
moritz
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://duesseldorf.ccc.de/~moritz/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
