Jon Arney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As I said, I am not opposed to using syslogd and think starting there > is a good idea. If you believe it is feasible without causing > recursive RPC calls, I'll believe you. My only concern was that > if, say, 'pfinet' needed to log something and syslog were configured > to write to UDP ports, pfinet would have to write to a UDP port > causing perhaps a recursive loop of log calls. I realize that this > is ultimately a pathological case, but it's worth considering.
Of course, but the right thing to do is to just have syslogd be a Hurd server as well as a UDP and PF_LOCAL server. We don't want to create a whole new logging facility. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
