On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 06:29:03PM -0300, Jorge P. de Morais Neto via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Hi. I use Guix atop Debian¹ testing (currently bullseye). > > I normally browse the web on GNU IceCat and sometimes Firefox and > Emacs EWW. I only use (ungoogled-)chromium for the rare websites that > don't work on the other browsers. Long ago I installed in Chromium the > extension The Great Suspender, and only today (months after G$$gle > Chrome, according to news articles) did my Chromium disable it for > having malware. And the only Chromium that did that for me was > Debian's. > > So, I hypothesize that the ungoogling process has disabled Chromium's > ability to automatically disable malware extensions. If true, that is a > serious defect of ungoogled-chromium and Guix should make sure that > users at least know about it. There could be a warning in the Guix > package description *and* on the browser's start page.
Chromium is a program that is meant to be "evergreen". Version numbers are not highlighted to the user and the software is supposed to update itself, quickly and often. It's like a "rolling release" just for that program. A variant of the package that blocks communication to Google and requires one of us to update it is, if you trust the Chromium team, categorically less up-to-date than a "normal Chromium" downloaded directly from chromium.org, and thus also less "secure", as you've seen. I don't know exactly how the "disable malware extensions" mechanism works, but it's likely that the "ungoogling" disables the possibility that it can happen quickly, outside of full program updates. It's a tradeoff we (have to?) make to offer a variant of Chromium that is judged acceptable by us under the Free System Distribution Guidelines, which Guix follows: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.en.html Personally I use the "regular" variants of browsers, that talk directly to the "motherships" of Google and Mozilla, for that reason. By the way, the Debian testing branch is the last to receive security updates, and in general has no guarantee of fast security updates. If you want to use a Debian with more up-to-date software than the stable branch and also are concerned about your security, you might consider using Debian sid.
