Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-19 13:50 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >>> Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-18 20:41 +0300) wrote: >>> >>>> It seems to me that this bug has no clear purpose, or too broad a >>>> purpose, or something. >>>> >>>> Could you retitle it, or close it, or fix it, whichever is appropriate? >>>> :-) >>> >>> Was it for me? >> >> ‘To whom it may concern’. :-) >> >>> I think the main purpose of this report was to tell us that "edit" >>> name is confusing. So I would retitle it to "Rename 'guix edit' as it >>> is confusing". But I don't know how; can it be done by sending some >>> control message? >> >> Yes, using the ‘retitle’ command, described somewhere at >> <http://debbugs.gnu.org/Developer.html>. > > Sorry, I don't see any mention of 'retitle' there, also I don't find > retitle control message while using emacs-debbugs package.
Sorry, it’s at <http://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html>. >> However, I think (1) the title should describe the bug, not the >> solution, and (2) ‘guix edit’ does what it says IMO, even if it can >> occasionally stumble upon read-only files. > > OK, well I don't know what to do with it then. What about the following > title: «"guix edit" name may be confusing»? Perfect! :-) Thanks, Ludo’.
