Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-18 20:41 +0300) wrote: > >> It seems to me that this bug has no clear purpose, or too broad a >> purpose, or something. >> >> Could you retitle it, or close it, or fix it, whichever is appropriate? >> :-) > > Was it for me?
‘To whom it may concern’. :-) > I think the main purpose of this report was to tell us that "edit" > name is confusing. So I would retitle it to "Rename 'guix edit' as it > is confusing". But I don't know how; can it be done by sending some > control message? Yes, using the ‘retitle’ command, described somewhere at <http://debbugs.gnu.org/Developer.html>. However, I think (1) the title should describe the bug, not the solution, and (2) ‘guix edit’ does what it says IMO, even if it can occasionally stumble upon read-only files. Ludo’.
