Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: > Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: >> Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: >> > Is this not exactly how bsd-style operates? >> Yes, but it’s only for BSD-style licenses. > > Finally I think we agree.
Nitpicking is what I do on my spare time. ;-) > I was suggesting to create something analogous to bsd-style, just with > a different name. But maybe bsd-style is enough, as the description is > sufficiently vague: "This is a BSD-style, non-copyleft free software > license." > > Fontconfig poses the same problem: They use something that looks > essentially like the MIT/X11 license, but with a slightly different > wording. > > So shall we create a new category, and if yes, under which name? Or shall > we use "bsd-style" for anything that does not fit? I would say the latter, because the former is going to be an endless endeavor. The URL passed to ‘bsd-style’ gives more details anyway. How does that sound? Ludo’.
