Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > Does it qualify as "bsd-like"? > It looks like BSD-3 to me, or at least “BSD-like”.
Sort of. Except that the second clause states that source code needs to be provided, whereas BSD just states that binary distributions need to keep the copyright notice. I could also add an entry to the licenses file, but I am afraid we might end up with almost as many licenses as packages. > > If not, would it make sense to add a license "other" to licenses.scm, > > which takes the same parameters as "bsd-like"? > I think (guix licenses) should export the constructor, but under the > name ‘make-license’ to avoid clashes with the ‘license’ field in > ‘package’ records. Is this not exactly how bsd-style operates? > Please align the opening paren under the ‘u’. > Please put the comment above the line it refers to, and move closing > parentheses to the end of the line. Okay, no problem. Andreas
