Follow-up Comment #14, bug #66919 (group groff): [comment #13 comment #13:] > In this case, the change is deliberate: > > "Support clearing a character's hyphenation code by copying > that of a character that lacks one."
Ah!
But it seems that this mechanism to clear a code needs to carve out an
exception for what I'm terming "reflexive hcode," right? Because the purpose
of that is to generate a new hyphenation code for a character that may never
have had one.
It's also curious that "reflexive hcode" works differently depending on how
the character is spelled: ".hcode \[~o] õ" now has a different effect from
".hcode õ õ".
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66919>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
